[CLUG-chat] Is Linux for losers?
jonathan at shuttleworthfoundation.org
Fri Jun 24 10:50:12 SAST 2005
Roland Giesler wrote:
> You guys are astounding. Every time something like this pops up on the
> list, you attack either the sender, the journalist, or the person mentioned
> in the article. This is really a good Micro$oft tactic and they have
> trained you well!!
> What about what Theo had to say? Is he correct in saying that the Linux
> kernel code is not good? Is not, why not?
It certainly isn't perfect, that doesn't mean his statements are justified.
> It's really immature to carry on the way most of you do, whenever there's a
> comment or criticism against Linux. Unless that changes, a large part of
> the world will never take you seriously.
> I'm ready for what may come my way.... ;-)
Roland, everyone are entitled to their opinion. If you're going to post
an anti-Linux article to a Linux community, you are going to get a
response. There's nothing immature about it. Perhaps the person who
posts provocative messages is more immature, if the intentions are not
to invoke intelligent conversation. Posting anti-Linux sentiments will
give you the same reactions as posting satanic content to a Christain
list. Or by posting pro-abortion content to a pro-life list. It's a fact
and the way things are and nobody is going to change just to keep you
happy. Get over it ;)
More information about the Clug-chat