[CLUG-chat] EU group set to recommend against Microsoft
charles at finebushpeople.co.za
Mon Mar 15 09:30:13 SAST 2004
The decisions look like rubbish to me ...
Second, the Commission will rule that Microsoft has given rival makers of
low-level servers too little information to compete with the company's
This much is true...but
As a result, Microsoft's low-level servers, which perform tasks such as
printing and file handling, work better with Windows.
Not true. My understanding is that Samba is almost 3 times faster than
Windows file sharing, and the underlying printing model of unix is FAR
SUPERIOR to the Windows one (in linux, the client computer does not need to
know what type of printer it is printing to, 'cos it sends all output in a
generic (postscript) format). In Windows, you need to load a printer driver
for whatever printer you send a job to (which works great at home because you
have 1 PC and one printer, but sucks in a company/university where you might
choose to print to a machine in another building / city / country).
The Windows approach to printing also prevents you from running a pool of
printers with failover/load balancing (unless they all use identical
The one area where things could improve in the linux samba implementations is
the PDC/login/encryption etc area.
The advisory committee is expected to approve a remedy requiring the U.S. firm
to share more of its protocols with rivals, charging a reasonable royalty. It
will be left to Microsoft to work out the precise solution, with close
oversight by the Commission, the sources said.
This worries me. What is a reasonable royalty? On the other hand, Samba has
come along fine without any help from MS, and probably a company will pay the
royalties and sell an open source application that does the Samba thing well
(would this be possible I wonder?).
Just my thoughts...
More information about the Clug-chat